HJ00074Introduced in the House
Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Phillip Miller, Esquire, Of Glastonbury To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.
Introduced by Steven Stafstrom, District 129
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Phillip Miller, Esquire, Of Glastonbury To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.
Where it stands
In Concurrence
May 5, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
House votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
Senate votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
Chamber not recorded votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
SenateStage: Senate Roll Call Vote 280 · May 5, 2026
35
Yes
1
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
36 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| John Fonfara | 1 | Yes |
| Douglas McCrory | 2 | Yes |
| Saud Anwar | 3 | Yes |
| MD Rahman | 4 | Yes |
| Derek Slap | 5 | Yes |
| Rick Lopes | 6 | Yes |
| John Kissel | 7 | Yes |
| Paul Honig | 8 | Yes |
| Matthew Lesser | 9 | Yes |
| Gary Winfield | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
Public Hearing 04/02
Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House
House Calendar Number 415
Adopted, House
On Consent Calendar
Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
Senate Calendar Number 443
Adopted, Senate
In Concurrence
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.