SB00243Introduced in the Senate
An Act Requiring A Study Of The Design Of Residential Electric Customer Bills.
Introduced by Energy and Technology Committee
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
To require the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority to conduct a study concerning the depiction of the public benefits charge on residential electric customer bills.
Where it stands
File Number 343
April 2, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
Chamber not recordedStage: ET Vote Tally Sheet (Joint Favorable Substitute) · March 17, 2026
19
Yes
7
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
26 senators recorded in this Chamber not recorded vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Raghib Allie-Brennan | 2 | Yes |
| James Sanchez | 6 | Yes |
| Mike Demicco | 21 | Yes |
| Nick Gauthier | 38 | Yes |
| Aundre Bumgardner | 41 | Yes |
| Savet Constantine | 42 | Yes |
| Jaime Foster | 57 | Yes |
| Maria Horn | 64 | Yes |
| Joe Canino | 65 | No |
| William Buckbee | 67 | No |
Bill history
Referred to Joint Committee on Energy and Technology
Public Hearing 02/24
Joint Favorable Substitute
Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/01/26 5:00 PM
Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
Senate Calendar Number 229
File Number 343
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.