H0299Introduced in the House
Blue Ribbon Projects
Introduced by State Affairs Committee
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Requires that development project meet certain requirements to qualify as blue ribbon project; requires blue ribbon project to have blue ribbon plan; requires project to receive dollar-for-dollar credits from local government; provides that certain easements or property must be granted without charge; requires landowner to apply to local government for approval of plan; provides local government review requirements; provides that blue ribbon plan governs use of property upon approval of plan application by local government; provides that project may be located on land with any future land use designation or zoning designation; provides appeal procedures for denial & approval of blue ribbon plan application; provides environmental review requirements.
Where it stands
Died on Second Reading Calendar
March 13, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House State Affairs Committee · February 26, 2026
21
Yes
5
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
27 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nathan Boyles | 3 | Yes |
| Philip Griffitts | 6 | Yes |
| Wyman Duggan | 12 | Yes |
| Angela Nixon | 13 | No |
| Nan Cobb | 26 | Yes |
| Richard Gentry | 27 | Yes |
| RaShon Young | 40 | Absent |
| Anna Eskamani | 42 | No |
| Leonard Spencer | 45 | No |
| Jeff Holcomb | 53 | Yes |
Bill history
Filed
Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Referred to Commerce Committee
Referred to State Affairs Committee
Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda
Favorable with CS by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
CS Filed
Referred to Commerce Committee
Referred to State Affairs Committee
Now in Commerce Committee
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
Added to Commerce Committee agenda
Favorable with CS by Commerce Committee
Reported out of Commerce Committee
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
CS Filed
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
Referred to State Affairs Committee
Now in State Affairs Committee
Added to State Affairs Committee agenda
Favorable with CS by State Affairs Committee
Reported out of State Affairs Committee
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
CS Filed
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 3)
Bill referred to House Calendar
Added to Second Reading Calendar
Died on Second Reading Calendar
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.