H1049Introduced in the House
Building Permit Requirements
Introduced by Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Provides that certain residential manufactured buildings may not be denied building permit for placement of such building; prohibits local government from adopting certain technical amendments to FBC; prohibits local enforcement agency from requiring building permit for work valued at specified amount; prohibits project from being divided into multiple projects; requires building permit for certain work regardless of value of work; requires contractor to maintain certain written records; prohibits local enforcement agency from requiring building permit for specified work on backup power system installed by certain persons or entities; requires local enforcement agencies to establish specified process to submit certain notice before installation of backup power system; prohibits local governments from adopting or enforcing certain ordinances, rules, or other measures; authorizes local enforcement agency to conduct one inspection, either in person or virtually; authorizes use of private provider for certain inspections; requires local enforcement agency to provide certain persons written notice of correction; authorizes stop-work order under specific circumstances; requires local enforcement agency to offer reinspection date within certain time period; provides that private provider inspection report constitutes acceptance; prohibits local enforcement agency from withholding or revoking certificate of occupancy based solely on failed inspection report.
Where it stands
Died in State Affairs Committee
March 13, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee · January 28, 2026
17
Yes
0
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
17 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nathan Boyles | 3 | Yes |
| Angela Nixon | 13 | Yes |
| Judson Sapp | 20 | Yes |
| Yvonne Hayes Hinson | 21 | Yes |
| Richard Gentry | 27 | Yes |
| Monique Miller | 33 | Yes |
| Bruce Antone | 41 | Yes |
| Anna Eskamani | 42 | Yes |
| Leonard Spencer | 45 | Yes |
| Brad Yeager | 56 | Yes |
Bill history
Filed
Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Referred to Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
Referred to State Affairs Committee
Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
Added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda
Favorable by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Now in Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
Added to Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee agenda
Favorable with CS by Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
Reported out of Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
CS Filed
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
Referred to State Affairs Committee
Now in State Affairs Committee
Died in State Affairs Committee
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.