The People's Ledger
← All Florida bills

H1075Introduced in the House

Utilities

Introduced

Introduced by Commerce Committee

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.

Official description

Requires municipalities that operate utility services to allow other municipalities & property owners outside its municipal boundaries to connect with & use its utility services under specified conditions; prohibits municipalities that operate utility services from denying such services based on specified criteria; requires municipalities to make certain determinations; provides for appeal of such determinations; provides that municipalities are not liable for such fees & costs under certain conditions; authorizes notices for rural electrical cooperative board of trustees meetings to be delivered by electronic mail; revises notice requirements for meetings during which elections will occur; requires board of trustees, beginning on specified date, to annually prepare list of cooperative members & to make list available for certain inspection; revises quorum requirements; revises requirements for rural electrical cooperative bylaws; requires appointment of election inspectors; authorizes rural electric cooperatives to conduct elections & membership votes through electronic voting; requires electronic voting to be authorized by resolution of board of trustees; provides for cooperative members to consent to & opt out of electronic voting; provides for cooperative members to petition board of trustees to adopt electronic voting.

Where it stands

Laid on Table, refer to CS/CS/CS/SB 1014

March 9, 2026

How did lawmakers vote?

HouseStage: House Commerce Committee · February 24, 2026

17

Yes

6

No

3

Absent or Not Voting

26 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each representative voted

RepresentativeDistrictVote
Michelle Salzman1Yes
Jason Shoaf7Yes
Gallop Franklin8Absent
Chuck Brannan10Yes
Wyman Duggan12Absent
Kimberly Daniels14Yes
Chase Tramont30Yes
Tyler Sirois31Yes
Erika Booth35Yes
David Smith38No

Bill history

  1. Filed

  2. Referred to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee

  3. Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  4. Referred to Commerce Committee

  5. Now in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee

  6. 1st Reading (Original Filed Version)

  7. Added to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee agenda

  8. Added to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee agenda

  9. Favorable by Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee

  10. Reported out of Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee

  11. Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  12. PCS added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda

  13. Favorable with CS by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  14. Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  15. Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)

  16. CS Filed

  17. Referred to Commerce Committee

  18. Now in Commerce Committee

  19. 1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)

  20. Added to Commerce Committee agenda

  21. Favorable with CS by Commerce Committee

  22. Reported out of Commerce Committee

  23. Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)

  24. CS Filed

  25. Bill referred to House Calendar

  26. 1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)

  27. Added to Second Reading Calendar

  28. Laid on Table, refer to CS/CS/CS/SB 1014

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.