S1748Introduced in the Senate
Evidence in Civil Actions Relating to Firearms
Introduced by Judiciary
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Providing that the absence of certain mechanisms or features may not be used as evidence of a defective product design, negligence, a duty to warn, strict liability, or evidence to support similar claims, etc.
Where it stands
Died in Commerce and Tourism
March 13, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Judiciary · February 10, 2026
8
Yes
3
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
11 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Don Gaetz | 1 | Yes |
| Jay Trumbull | 2 | Yes |
| Clay Yarborough | 4 | Yes |
| Tom Leek | 7 | Yes |
| Colleen Burton | 12 | Yes |
| Nick DiCeglie | 18 | Yes |
| Ed Hooper | 21 | Yes |
| Lori Berman | 26 | No |
| Kathleen Passidomo | 28 | No |
| Tina Polsky | 30 | No |
Bill history
Filed
Referred to Judiciary; Commerce and Tourism; Rules
Introduced
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/10/26, 12:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 8 NAYS 3
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
Now in Commerce and Tourism
Died in Commerce and Tourism
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.