HF2016Introduced in the House
A bill for an act relating to requirements for proof of ownership of dogs and providing penalties.(See HF 2190.)
Introduced by Samantha Fett, District 22
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to requirements for proof of ownership of dogs and providing penalties.(See HF 2190.)
Where it stands
Withdrawn. H.J. 672.
March 16, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House Committee On Judiciary Report · January 27, 2026
19
Yes
0
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
21 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skyler Wheeler | 4 | Absent |
| Henry Stone | 9 | Absent |
| John Wills | 10 | Yes |
| Craig Williams | 11 | Yes |
| Steven Holt | 12 | Yes |
| Samantha Fett | 22 | Yes |
| Megan Srinivas | 30 | Yes |
| Sean Bagniewski | 35 | Yes |
| Jon Dunwell | 38 | Yes |
| Rick Olson | 39 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, referred to Judiciary. H.J. 43.
Subcommittee: Fett, Wheeler and Wichtendahl. H.J. 117.
Subcommittee Meeting: 01/21/2026 12:00PM RM 19.
Subcommittee recommends passage.
Committee report, recommending passage. H.J. 160.
Committee vote: Yeas, 19. Nays, 0. Excused, 2. H.J. 160.
Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 2190.
Withdrawn. H.J. 672.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.