SF2227Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to tuition charged to resident undergraduate students enrolled at regents institutions.(Formerly SF 2002.)
Introduced by Education
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to tuition charged to resident undergraduate students enrolled at regents institutions.(Formerly SF 2002.)
Where it stands
Placed on calendar under unfinished business. S.J. 600.
March 19, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Education Report · February 5, 2026
10
Yes
5
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
16 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff Taylor | 2 | Yes |
| Lynn Evans | 3 | Yes |
| Tim Kraayenbrink | 4 | Yes |
| Tom Shipley | 9 | Yes |
| Julian Garrett | 11 | Absent |
| Amy Sinclair | 12 | Yes |
| Sarah Trone Garriott | 14 | No |
| Ken Rozenboom | 19 | Yes |
| Mike Pike | 20 | Yes |
| Jesse Green | 24 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 212.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 218.
Fiscal note.
Attached to HF 2362. S.J. 574.
Placed on calendar under unfinished business. S.J. 600.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.