SF2295Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to licenses to conduct pari-mutuel wagering on dog races, and including effective date provisions.(Formerly SSB 3002.)
Introduced by State Government
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to licenses to conduct pari-mutuel wagering on dog races, and including effective date provisions.(Formerly SSB 3002.)
Where it stands
Subcommittee: Dawson, Bisignano, and Schultz. S.J. 314.
February 18, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate State Government Report · February 12, 2026
15
Yes
1
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
18 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Catelin Drey | 1 | Absent |
| Jason Schultz | 6 | Yes |
| Dan Dawson | 10 | Yes |
| Cherielynn Westrich | 13 | Yes |
| Tony Bisignano | 15 | Absent |
| Ken Rozenboom | 19 | Yes |
| Mike Bousselot | 21 | Yes |
| Matt Blake | 22 | Yes |
| Jesse Green | 24 | No |
| Dennis Guth | 28 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 268.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 285.
Referred to Ways and Means. S.J. 289.
Subcommittee: Dawson, Bisignano, and Schultz. S.J. 314.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.