SF2342Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to the required beneficiary and use of a public officer insurance policy.(Formerly SSB 3069.)
Introduced by Local Government
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to the required beneficiary and use of a public officer insurance policy.(Formerly SSB 3069.)
Where it stands
Withdrawn. S.J. 616.
March 23, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Local Government Report · Date not recorded
12
Yes
0
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
13 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff Taylor | 2 | Yes |
| Kevin Alons | 7 | Yes |
| Cherielynn Westrich | 13 | Yes |
| Renee Hardman | 16 | Yes |
| Izaah Knox | 17 | Yes |
| Mike Bousselot | 21 | Yes |
| Herman Quirmbach | 25 | Yes |
| Dennis Guth | 28 | Yes |
| Dave Sires | 38 | Yes |
| Janice Weiner | 45 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 292.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 298.
Amendment S-5039 filed. S.J. 437.
Attached to HF 2522. S.J. 494.
Placed on calendar under unfinished business. S.J. 600.
Amendment S-5039 adopted. S.J. 615.
HF 2522 substituted. S.J. 615.
Withdrawn. S.J. 616.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.