SF2440Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to the permissible uses of certain school district property tax revenue for urban renewal projects and including effective date provisions.(Formerly SSB 3136.)
Introduced by Local Government
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to the permissible uses of certain school district property tax revenue for urban renewal projects and including effective date provisions.(Formerly SSB 3136.)
Where it stands
Subcommittee: Dawson, Gruenhagen, and Winckler. S.J. 393.
February 24, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Local Government Report · February 23, 2026
8
Yes
4
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
13 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff Taylor | 2 | Yes |
| Kevin Alons | 7 | Absent |
| Cherielynn Westrich | 13 | Yes |
| Renee Hardman | 16 | No |
| Izaah Knox | 17 | No |
| Mike Bousselot | 21 | Yes |
| Herman Quirmbach | 25 | No |
| Dennis Guth | 28 | Yes |
| Dave Sires | 38 | Yes |
| Janice Weiner | 45 | No |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 358.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 371.
Referred to Ways and Means. S.J. 376.
Subcommittee: Dawson, Gruenhagen, and Winckler. S.J. 393.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.