SF2473Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to matters under the purview of the department of management, and including effective date and applicability provisions.(Formerly SF 2141, SSB 3028.)
Introduced by Appropriations
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to matters under the purview of the department of management, and including effective date and applicability provisions.(Formerly SF 2141, SSB 3028.)
Where it stands
NOBA: Senate Full Approps
March 26, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Appropriations Report · March 24, 2026
19
Yes
0
No
3
Absent or Not Voting
22 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tim Kraayenbrink | 4 | Yes |
| Dave Rowley | 5 | Absent |
| Mark Costello | 8 | Yes |
| Tom Shipley | 9 | Yes |
| Dan Dawson | 10 | Yes |
| Julian Garrett | 11 | Absent |
| Izaah Knox | 17 | Yes |
| Janet Petersen | 18 | Yes |
| Mike Bousselot | 21 | Yes |
| Matt Blake | 22 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on Appropriations calendar. S.J. 639.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 640.
NOBA: Senate Full Approps
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.