SF496Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to county and city regulation of pet licenses and fees.(Formerly SSB 1095.)
Introduced by Local Government
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to county and city regulation of pet licenses and fees.(Formerly SSB 1095.)
Where it stands
Subcommittee recommends amendment and passage.
March 19, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Local Government Report · March 4, 2025
11
Yes
0
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
13 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rocky De Witt | 1 | Yes |
| Jeff Taylor | 2 | Absent |
| Cherielynn Westrich | 13 | Yes |
| Izaah Knox | 17 | Yes |
| Herman Quirmbach | 25 | Yes |
| Dennis Guth | 28 | Yes |
| Mike Klimesh | 32 | Yes |
| Dave Sires | 38 | Absent |
| Zach Wahls | 43 | Yes |
| Janice Weiner | 45 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 401.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 407.
Referred to Ways and Means. S.J. 427.
Subcommittee: Green, Bousselot, and Townsend. S.J. 491.
Subcommittee Meeting: 03/19/2025 2:30PM Room 217 Conference Room.
Subcommittee recommends amendment and passage.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.