SF524Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to awarding the costs in administrative hearings or court proceedings involving the collection of tax, penalties, and interest by the department of revenue.(Formerly SSB 1005.)
Introduced by Judiciary
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to awarding the costs in administrative hearings or court proceedings involving the collection of tax, penalties, and interest by the department of revenue.(Formerly SSB 1005.)
Where it stands
Referred to Judiciary. S.J. 1057.
June 16, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Judiciary Report · March 5, 2025
20
Yes
0
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
20 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff Taylor | 2 | Yes |
| Lynn Evans | 3 | Yes |
| Dave Rowley | 5 | Yes |
| Jason Schultz | 6 | Yes |
| Tom Shipley | 9 | Yes |
| Dan Dawson | 10 | Yes |
| Julian Garrett | 11 | Yes |
| Cherielynn Westrich | 13 | Yes |
| Tony Bisignano | 15 | Yes |
| Izaah Knox | 17 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 418.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 426.
Referred to Judiciary. S.J. 1057.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.