SF567Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to property law by modifying provisions related to forcible entry and detainer actions and to landlord and tenant law.(Formerly SSB 1204.)
Introduced by Commerce
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to property law by modifying provisions related to forcible entry and detainer actions and to landlord and tenant law.(Formerly SSB 1204.)
Where it stands
Subcommittee: Webster, Driscoll, and Petersen. S.J. 132.
January 22, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Commerce Report · March 10, 2025
18
Yes
2
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
20 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rocky De Witt | 1 | Yes |
| Dave Rowley | 5 | Yes |
| Jason Schultz | 6 | Yes |
| Sarah Trone Garriott | 14 | Yes |
| Tony Bisignano | 15 | No |
| Izaah Knox | 17 | Yes |
| Janet Petersen | 18 | No |
| Mike Bousselot | 21 | Yes |
| Matt Blake | 22 | Yes |
| Kara Warme | 26 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 459.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 467.
Referred to Commerce. S.J. 1058.
Subcommittee: Webster, Driscoll, and Petersen. S.J. 132.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.