SF571Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties.(Formerly SSB 1055.)
Introduced by Judiciary
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to defense subpoenas in criminal cases, and providing penalties.(Formerly SSB 1055.)
Where it stands
Read first time, referred to Judiciary. H.J. 789.
March 24, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Shall the bill pass? · March 24, 2025
34
Yes
15
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
50 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rocky De Witt | 1 | Yes |
| Jeff Taylor | 2 | Yes |
| Lynn Evans | 3 | Yes |
| Tim Kraayenbrink | 4 | Yes |
| Dave Rowley | 5 | Yes |
| Jason Schultz | 6 | Yes |
| Kevin Alons | 7 | Yes |
| Mark Costello | 8 | Yes |
| Tom Shipley | 9 | Yes |
| Dan Dawson | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 460.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 473.
Fiscal note.
Passed Senate, yeas 34, nays 15. S.J. 617.
Immediate message. S.J. 619.
Message from Senate. H.J. 777.
Read first time, referred to Judiciary. H.J. 789.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.