SF643Introduced in the Senate
A bill for an act relating to certain state highways not designated as part of the interstate road system, including the operation of implements of husbandry on such highways, and including applicability provisions.(Formerly SF 568, SSB 1187.)
Introduced by Appropriations
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A bill for an act relating to certain state highways not designated as part of the interstate road system, including the operation of implements of husbandry on such highways, and including applicability provisions.(Formerly SF 568, SSB 1187.)
Where it stands
Withdrawn. S.J. 962.
May 12, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Appropriations Report · April 30, 2025
18
Yes
1
No
3
Absent or Not Voting
22 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tim Kraayenbrink | 4 | Yes |
| Dave Rowley | 5 | Yes |
| Mark Costello | 8 | Absent |
| Tom Shipley | 9 | Yes |
| Julian Garrett | 11 | Yes |
| Izaah Knox | 17 | Yes |
| Janet Petersen | 18 | Yes |
| Mike Bousselot | 21 | Yes |
| Matt Blake | 22 | Yes |
| Jesse Green | 24 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, placed on Appropriations calendar. S.J. 932.
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 933.
Attached to HF 1025. S.J. 934.
NOBA: Senate Full Approps
HF 1025 substituted. S.J. 961.
Withdrawn. S.J. 962.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.