HB4679Introduced in the House
VIDEO GAMING-TRANSPARENCY
Introduced by Kambium Buckner, District 26
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Amends the Video Gaming Act. Requires the Illinois Gaming Board to provide written status updates to each applicant for a license issued under the Act no later than 30, 60, and 90 days after the date the application is deemed complete by the Board. Sets forth information to be included in the written status updates. Provides that if the Board has not issued a final determination approving or denying an application within 365 days after the date the application is deemed complete, the Board shall issue a conditional approval to the applicant unless the delay is attributable to: the applicant's failure to timely provide requested information or documentation; a pending criminal investigation or enforcement action directly involving the applicant; or a written finding by the Board, supported by specific facts, that issuance of a conditional approval would pose a material risk to the public interest or the integrity of video gaming. Provides that a conditional approval authorizes the applicant to proceed with preparatory business activities consistent with licensure but does not authorize operation of video gaming terminals until final approval is issued. Provides that nothing limits the Board's authority to approve, deny, suspend, revoke, or condition a license upon completion of its investigation. Provides that any delay caused by the applicant's failure to timely respond to a written request from the Board tolls the time periods until the requested information is received. Allows the Board to adopt rules to implement the provisions.
Where it stands
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
April 17, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House Gaming Committee · March 25, 2026
16
Yes
0
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
18 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Hernandez | 2 | Not Voting |
| Jawaharial Williams | 10 | Not Voting |
| Kevin Olickal | 16 | Yes |
| Bradley Stephens | 20 | Yes |
| Edgar Gonzalez | 23 | Yes |
| Curtis Tarver | 25 | Yes |
| Kambium Buckner | 26 | Yes |
| Robert Rita | 28 | Yes |
| Patrick Sheehan | 37 | Yes |
| Daniel Didech | 59 | Yes |
Bill history
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Kam Buckner
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Jay Hoffman
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Edgar González, Jr.
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Curtis J. Tarver, II
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Nicholas K. Smith
First Reading
Referred to Rules Committee
Assigned to Gaming Committee
Do Pass / Short Debate Gaming Committee; 016-000-000
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
Second Reading - Short Debate
Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.