HB2569Introduced in the House
Requiring actions challenging the constitutionality of an election statute to be brought in the district court of Shawnee county and providing a conditional amendment to limit advance voting if a court order invalidates or enjoins the signature verification requirement.
Introduced by Elections
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Requiring actions challenging the constitutionality of an election statute to be brought in the district court of Shawnee county and providing a conditional amendment to limit advance voting if a court order invalidates or enjoins the signature verification requirement.
Where it stands
House No motion to reconsider vetoed bill; Veto sustained
April 10, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
House votes
2 recorded votes · each counted separately
Senate votes
2 recorded votes · each counted separately
HouseStage: House Conference Committee Report was adopted - Yea: 78 Nay: 45 · March 26, 2026
78
Yes
45
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
125 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dale Helwig | 1 | Yes |
| Kenneth Collins | 2 | No |
| Charles Smith | 3 | Yes |
| Rick James | 4 | Yes |
| Courtney Sappington | 5 | Yes |
| Samantha Poetter Parshall | 6 | No |
| Dan Goddard | 7 | Yes |
| Chris Croft | 8 | Yes |
| Fred Gardner | 9 | Yes |
| Suzanne Wikle | 10 | No |
Bill history
House Introduced
House Referred to Committee on Elections
House Hearing: Tuesday, February 10, 2026, 3:30 PM Room 218-N
House Committee Report recommending bill be passed by Committee on Elections
House Committee of the Whole - Be passed
House Final Action - Passed; Yea: 74 Nay: 48
Senate Received and Introduced
Senate Referred to Committee on Federal and State Affairs
Senate Hearing: Monday, March 9, 2026, 10:30 AM Room 144-S
Senate Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by Committee on Federal and State Affairs
Senate Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted
Senate Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended
Senate Final Action - Passed as amended; Yea: 26 Nay: 14
House Nonconcurred with amendments; Conference Committee requested; appointed Representative Proctor , Representative Waggoner and Representative Haskins as conferees
Senate Motion to accede adopted; Senator Thompson, Senator Blew and Senator Faust Goudeau appointed as conferees
Senate Conference Committee Report agree to disagree adopted; Senator Thompson, Senator Blew and Senator Faust Goudeau appointed as second conferees
Senate Conference committee report now available
House Conference Committee Report agree to disagree adopted; Representative Proctor, Representative Waggoner and Representative Haskins appointed as second conferees
Senate Conference committee report now available
Senate Conference Committee Report was adopted; Yea: 28 Nay: 12
House Conference Committee Report was adopted; Yea: 78 Nay: 45
House Enrolled and presented to Governor on Monday, March 30, 2026
House Engrossed on Sunday, March 29, 2026
House Vetoed by Governor; Returned to House on Wednesday, April 8, 2026
House No motion to reconsider vetoed bill; Veto sustained
Verify the information
- Official page on the Kansas Legislature website
- House Committee on Elections Report (amendment)
- Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs Report (amendment)
- Conference Committee Report (amendment)
- Conference Committee Report (amendment)
- Fiscal Note (supplement)
- Analysis (supplement)
- Analysis (supplement)
- Analysis (supplement)
- Introduced (text)
- Amended (text)
- Enrolled (text)
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.