HB2719Introduced in the House
Providing an exception to the rules and regulations filing act for technical amendments, creating a process for certain rules and regulations to receive priority status in the adoption process, removing references to revival of rules and regulations, clarifying that the department of the budget is not required to approve proposed rules and regulations mandated by the federal government, adding references to department of corrections rules and regulations that are not subject to the act and requiring an agency submit a proposed rule and regulation to the joint committee on administrative rules and regulations prior to presentation of a bill to the legislature for ratification.
Introduced by Commerce, Labor and Economic Development
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Providing an exception to the rules and regulations filing act for technical amendments, creating a process for certain rules and regulations to receive priority status in the adoption process, removing references to revival of rules and regulations, clarifying that the department of the budget is not required to approve proposed rules and regulations mandated by the federal government, adding references to department of corrections rules and regulations that are not subject to the act and requiring an agency submit a proposed rule and regulation to the joint committee on administrative rules and regulations prior to presentation of a bill to the legislature for ratification.
Where it stands
Senate Motion to override veto prevailed; Yea: 38 Nay: 1
April 9, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
House votes
3 recorded votes · each counted separately
Senate votes
2 recorded votes · each counted separately
SenateStage: Senate Motion to override veto prevailed - Yea: 38 Nay: 1 · April 9, 2026
38
Yes
1
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
40 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Hill | 70 | Yes |
| Silas Miller | 86 | Absent |
| Craig Bowser | 1 | Yes |
| Marci Francisco | 2 | Yes |
| Rick Kloos | 3 | Yes |
| David Haley | 4 | Yes |
| Jeff Klemp | 5 | Yes |
| Pat Pettey | 6 | Yes |
| Ethan Corson | 7 | No |
| Cindy Holscher | 8 | Yes |
Bill history
House Introduced
House Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development
House Hearing: Friday, February 13, 2026, 1:30 PM Room 346-S
House Committee Report recommending bill be passed and placed on Consent Calendar by
House Final Action - Passed; Yea: 121 Nay: 0
Senate Received and Introduced
Senate Referred to Committee on Commerce
Senate Hearing: Tuesday, March 3, 2026, 1:30 PM Room 159-S
Senate Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by Committee on Commerce
Senate Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted
Senate Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended
Senate Final Action - Passed as amended; Yea: 40 Nay: 0
House Concurred with amendments; Yea: 122 Nay: 0
House Engrossed on Tuesday, March 24, 2026
House Enrolled and presented to Governor on Friday, March 27, 2026
House Vetoed by Governor; Returned to House on Monday, April 6, 2026
House Motion to override veto prevailed; Yea: 89 Nay: 34
Senate Motion to override veto prevailed; Yea: 38 Nay: 1
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.