SB66Introduced in the Senate
Substitute for SB 66 by Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics - Requiring annual filing of the statement of substantial interests by elected or appointed city or county officials, providing that officials of governmental subdivisions other than cities or counties file statements of substantial interests if any change in substantial interests occurred and requiring governmental officials with a substantial interest in a real estate development project to verbally disclose such interest prior to participating in any discussion, review or action on a proposed zoning change or permit.
Introduced by Local Government, Transparency and Ethics
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Substitute for SB 66 by Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics - Requiring annual filing of the statement of substantial interests by elected or appointed city or county officials, providing that officials of governmental subdivisions other than cities or counties file statements of substantial interests if any change in substantial interests occurred and requiring governmental officials with a substantial interest in a real estate development project to verbally disclose such interest prior to participating in any discussion, review or action on a proposed zoning change or permit.
Where it stands
House Referred to Committee on Local Government
February 2, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Emergency Final Action - Substitute passed as amended - Yea: 36 Nay: 3 · January 28, 2026
36
Yes
3
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
40 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Hill | 70 | Yes |
| Silas Miller | 86 | Yes |
| Craig Bowser | 1 | Yes |
| Marci Francisco | 2 | Yes |
| Rick Kloos | 3 | Yes |
| David Haley | 4 | Yes |
| Jeff Klemp | 5 | Yes |
| Pat Pettey | 6 | No |
| Ethan Corson | 7 | Yes |
| Cindy Holscher | 8 | No |
Bill history
Senate Introduced
Senate Referred to Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics
Senate Hearing: Wednesday, February 12, 2025, 9:30 AM Room 142-S
Senate Hearing: Wednesday, February 26, 2025, 9:30 AM Room 142-S
Senate Committee Report recommending substitute bill be passed by Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics
Senate Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted recommending substitute bill be passed
Senate Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Senator Tyson
Senate Senator Clifford raised a question of germaneness. The amendment was ruled germane.
Senate Committee of the Whole - Amendment by Senator Tyson was adopted
Senate Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Senator Shallenburger
Senate Committee of the Whole - Amendment by Senator Shallenburger was adopted
Senate Committee of the Whole - Substitute bill be passed as amended
Senate Emergency Final Action - Substitute passed as amended; Yea: 36 Nay: 3
House Received and Introduced
House Referred to Committee on Local Government
Verify the information
- Official page on the Kansas Legislature website
- Senate Committee on Local Government, Transparency and Ethics Report (amendment)
- Senate Floor Amendment (Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Senator Tyson) (amendment)
- Senate Floor Amendment (Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by Senator Shallenburger) (amendment)
- Fiscal Note (supplement)
- Analysis (supplement)
- Analysis (supplement)
- Introduced (text)
- Comm Sub (text)
- Amended (text)
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.