HR289Introduced in the House
Urges and requests the Department of Conservation and Energy to review policies and practices related to the redaction of proposed well site locations
Introduced by Shane Mack, District 95
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Urges and requests the Department of Conservation and Energy to review policies and practices related to the redaction of proposed well site locations
Where it stands
Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House.
June 3, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House Vote on HR 289 FINAL CONSIDERATION (#1869) · June 1, 2026
89
Yes
0
No
16
Absent or Not Voting
105 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Danny McCormick | 1 | Yes |
| Steven Jackson | 2 | Yes |
| Tammy Phelps | 3 | Yes |
| Joy Walters | 4 | Absent |
| Dennis Bamburg | 5 | Yes |
| Michael Melerine | 6 | Yes |
| Lawrence Bagley | 7 | Absent |
| Raymond Crews | 8 | Yes |
| Dodie Horton | 9 | Yes |
| Wayne McMahen | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
Read by title. Lies over under the rules.
Called from the calendar.
Rules suspended.
Read by title, referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.
Reported favorably (12-0).
Read by title, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
Scheduled for floor debate on 06/01/2026.
Read by title, roll called, yeas 89, nays 0. The resolution was adopted.
Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.