LD1044Introduced in the House
An Act to Clarify the Qualifying Use of Tax Increment Financing for Extension of a Development District
Introduced by Amy Kuhn, District 111
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
An Act to Clarify the Qualifying Use of Tax Increment Financing for Extension of a Development District
Where it stands
PASSED TO BE ENACTED, in concurrence.
June 13, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
House votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
Senate votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
SenateStage: Accept Majority Ought To Pass Report RC #477 · June 12, 2025
25
Yes
10
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
35 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Susan Bernard | 1 | No |
| Harold Stewart | 2 | Yes |
| Bradlee Farrin | 3 | Yes |
| Stacey Guerin | 4 | No |
| Russell Black | 5 | Yes |
| Marianne Moore | 6 | No |
| Nicole Grohoski | 7 | Yes |
| Michael Tipping | 8 | Yes |
| Joseph Baldacci | 9 | Yes |
| David Haggan | 10 | No |
Bill history
Received by the Clerk of the House on March 12, 2025.
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on TAXATION pursuant to Joint Rule 308.2 and ordered printed pursuant to Joint Rule 401.
Carried over, in the same posture, to the next special or regular session of the 132nd Legislature, pursuant to Joint Order SP 519.
Work Session Held
Voted: Divided Report
Reported Out: OTP/ONTP
Reports READ.
On motion of Representative CLOUTIER of Lewiston, the Majority Ought to Pass Report was ACCEPTED.
ROLL CALL NO. 442 (Yeas 73 - Nays 65 - Absent 11 - Excused 2)
The Bill was READ ONCE.
Under suspension of the rules, the Bill was given its SECOND READING without REFERENCE to the Committee on Bills in the Second Reading.
The Bill was PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED.
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
Reports Read
On motion by Senator GROHOSKI of Hancock the Majority Ought to Pass Report ACCEPTED PREVAILED
Roll Call Ordered Roll Call Number 477 Yeas 25 - Nays 10 - Excused 0 - Absent 0
READ ONCE
Under suspension of the Rules, READ A SECOND TIME AND PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED in concurrence.
PASSED TO BE ENACTED.
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
PASSED TO BE ENACTED, in concurrence.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.