HB1028Introduced in the House
The selection process for construction management at-risk planning and design phase services and the procurement of architect, engineer, construction management, and land surveying services.
Introduced by Legislative Management
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 1 of section 48-01.2-20, subdivision f of subsection 5 of section 48-01.2-20, subsection 6 of section 48-01.2-20, section 48-01.2-22, and subsection 5 of section 54-44.7-03 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the selection process for construction management at-risk planning and design phase services and the procurement of architect, engineer, construction management, and land surveying services.
Where it stands
Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 34 nays 59
February 24, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House Second reading · February 24, 2025
34
Yes
59
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
93 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Hatlestad | 1 | No |
| David Richter | 1 | No |
| Bert Anderson | 2 | Yes |
| Donald Longmuir | 2 | No |
| Jeff Hoverson | 3 | No |
| Lori VanWinkle | 3 | Yes |
| Clayton Fegley | 4 | No |
| Lisa Finley-Deville | 4 | Yes |
| Scott Louser | 5 | No |
| Jay Fisher | 5 | No |
Bill history
Introduced, first reading, referred to Government and Veterans Affairs
Committee Hearing 11:00 (Government and Veterans Affairs)
Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 8 4 1
Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 34 nays 59
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.