HCR3013Introduced in the House
A concurrent resolution urging the United States Supreme Court to restore the definition of marriage to a union between one man and one woman.
Introduced by Bill Tveit, District 33
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
A concurrent resolution urging the United States Supreme Court to restore the definition of marriage to a union between one man and one woman.
Where it stands
Second reading, failed to adopt
March 13, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House Second reading, adopted yeas 52 nays 40 · February 24, 2025
52
Yes
40
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
93 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Hatlestad | 1 | Yes |
| David Richter | 1 | No |
| Bert Anderson | 2 | Yes |
| Donald Longmuir | 2 | Yes |
| Jeff Hoverson | 3 | Absent |
| Lori VanWinkle | 3 | Yes |
| Clayton Fegley | 4 | No |
| Lisa Finley-Deville | 4 | No |
| Scott Louser | 5 | Yes |
| Jay Fisher | 5 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, first reading, referred to Judiciary
Committee Hearing 10:00 (Judiciary)
Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 11 1 2
Laid over one legislative day
Laid over two legislative days
Second reading, adopted yeas 52 nays 40
Received from House
Introduced, first reading, referred to Judiciary
Committee Hearing 03:15 (Judiciary)
Reported back without recommendation 6 1 0
Second reading, failed to adopt
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.