CACR9Introduced in the House
Relating to the retirement age for judges. Providing that the mandatory judicial retirement age shall be increased from 70 to 75.
Introduced by Bob Lynn, District 17-ROC
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Relating to the retirement age for judges. Providing that the mandatory judicial retirement age shall be increased from 70 to 75.
Where it stands
Ought to Pass: Motion Failed DV 136-185 Lacking Necessary Three-Fifths Vote 03/11/2026 House Journal 7 P. 228
March 11, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
No recorded vote is available for this bill yet.
Bill history
Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Judiciary House Journal 1 P. 40
==RESCHEDULED== Public Hearing: 01/28/2026 02:00 pm GP 230
Public Hearing: 01/28/2026 01:30 pm GP 230
Executive Session: 01/28/2026 01:30 pm GP 230
Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass 01/28/2026 (Vote 10-8; Regular Calendar) House Calendar 10 P. 55
Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate
Ought to Pass: Motion Failed DV 136-185 Lacking Necessary Three-Fifths Vote 03/11/2026 House Journal 7 P. 228
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.