A00510Introduced in the Assembly
Relates to the scheduling of a fact finding hearing after the issuance of a temporary order of protection in family court; provides that such hearing shall be scheduled no later than 14 days after the temporary order is issued.
Introduced by Mary Walsh, District 112
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Relates to the scheduling of a fact finding hearing after the issuance of a temporary order of protection in family court; provides that such hearing shall be scheduled no later than 14 days after the temporary order is issued.
Where it stands
held for consideration in judiciary
May 18, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Judiciary Committee: Held for Consideration · May 18, 2026
13
Yes
6
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
21 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Doug Smith | 5 | No |
| Keith Brown | 12 | No |
| Charles Lavine | 13 | Yes |
| John Mikulin | 17 | Absent |
| David Weprin | 24 | Yes |
| Edward Braunstein | 26 | Yes |
| Sam Berger | 27 | No |
| Jenifer Rajkumar | 38 | Yes |
| Robert Carroll | 44 | Yes |
| Marcela Mitaynes | 51 | Yes |
Bill history
referred to judiciary
referred to judiciary
held for consideration in judiciary
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.