A01420Introduced in the Assembly
Requires that nuisance wildlife control operators disclose to the client, in writing, that euthanasia may be used to resolve a wildlife related problem.
Introduced by Linda Rosenthal, District 67
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Requires that nuisance wildlife control operators disclose to the client, in writing, that euthanasia may be used to resolve a wildlife related problem.
Where it stands
advanced to third reading cal.252
February 12, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Environmental Conservation Committee: Favorable · February 10, 2026
21
Yes
8
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
30 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tommy Schiavoni | 1 | Yes |
| Rebecca Kassay | 4 | Yes |
| Keith Brown | 12 | Yes |
| Khaleel Anderson | 31 | Yes |
| Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas | 34 | Yes |
| Robert Carroll | 44 | Yes |
| William Colton | 47 | Yes |
| Jaime Williams | 59 | Yes |
| Grace Lee | 65 | Yes |
| Deborah Glick | 66 | Yes |
Bill history
referred to environmental conservation
reported referred to rules
referred to environmental conservation
reported
advanced to third reading cal.252
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.