A02539Introduced in the Assembly
Requires mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts to be printed in large font type.
Introduced by Jeffrey Dinowitz, District 81
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Requires mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts to be printed in large font type.
Where it stands
REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
March 11, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Floor Vote - Final Passage · March 12, 2025
99
Yes
46
No
5
Absent or Not Voting
150 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tommy Schiavoni | 1 | Yes |
| Jodi Giglio | 2 | No |
| Joseph DeStefano | 3 | No |
| Rebecca Kassay | 4 | Yes |
| Doug Smith | 5 | No |
| Philip Ramos | 6 | Yes |
| Jarett Gandolfo | 7 | No |
| Michael Fitzpatrick | 8 | No |
| Michael Durso | 9 | Yes |
| Steve Stern | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
referred to consumer affairs and protection
reported referred to codes
reported
advanced to third reading cal.50
passed assembly
delivered to senate
REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
DIED IN SENATE
RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
ordered to third reading cal.91
passed assembly
delivered to senate
REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.