A03235Introduced in the Assembly
Adds Moodna Creek in Orange County to the definition of inland waterways for waterfront revitalization.
Introduced by Christopher Eachus, District 99
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Adds Moodna Creek in Orange County to the definition of inland waterways for waterfront revitalization.
Where it stands
substituted by s279
June 13, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Rules Committee: Favorable · June 13, 2025
29
Yes
0
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
31 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Doug Smith | 5 | Yes |
| Charles Lavine | 13 | Yes |
| Edward Ra | 19 | Yes |
| Nily Rozic | 25 | Yes |
| Edward Braunstein | 26 | Yes |
| Andrew Hevesi | 28 | Yes |
| Alicia Hyndman | 29 | Yes |
| Vivian Cook | 32 | Yes |
| Clyde Vanel | 33 | Absent |
| Catalina Cruz | 39 | Yes |
Bill history
referred to environmental conservation
reported referred to ways and means
reported referred to rules
reported
rules report cal.711
ordered to third reading rules cal.711
substituted by s279
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.