A03946Introduced in the Assembly
Requires age verification for internet pornography websites; imposes a $50,000 penalty per day for violations; provides exemptions for news organizations.
Introduced by Mary Walsh, District 112
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Requires age verification for internet pornography websites; imposes a $50,000 penalty per day for violations; provides exemptions for news organizations.
Where it stands
referred to consumer affairs and protection
January 7, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Consumer Affairs And Protection Committee: Held for Consideration · May 19, 2025
10
Yes
5
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
16 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Durso | 9 | No |
| Jacob Blumencranz | 15 | No |
| John Mikulin | 17 | No |
| Nily Rozic | 25 | Yes |
| Jenifer Rajkumar | 38 | Yes |
| Brian Cunningham | 43 | Yes |
| Robert Carroll | 44 | Yes |
| Emily Gallagher | 50 | Yes |
| Phara Souffrant Forrest | 57 | Yes |
| Charles Fall | 61 | Absent |
Bill history
referred to consumer affairs and protection
held for consideration in consumer affairs and protection
referred to consumer affairs and protection
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.