A05960Introduced in the Assembly
Permits a military spouse to practice an occupation upon submission of licensure, certification or registration to practice an equivalent occupation issued by any other state; provided the licensure standards are not lower than those of this state.
Introduced by Brian Miller, District 122
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Permits a military spouse to practice an occupation upon submission of licensure, certification or registration to practice an equivalent occupation issued by any other state; provided the licensure standards are not lower than those of this state.
Where it stands
referred to economic development
January 7, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Economic Development Committee: Held for Consideration · May 20, 2025
22
Yes
1
No
3
Absent or Not Voting
26 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Kassay | 4 | Yes |
| Steve Stern | 10 | Yes |
| Keith Brown | 12 | Absent |
| Judy Griffin | 21 | Yes |
| Alicia Hyndman | 29 | Yes |
| Larinda Hooks | 35 | Yes |
| Brian Cunningham | 43 | Yes |
| Alec Brook-Krasny | 46 | Yes |
| Nikki Lucas | 60 | Yes |
| Samuel Pirozzolo | 63 | Absent |
Bill history
referred to economic development
held for consideration in economic development
referred to economic development
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.