A06447Introduced in the Assembly
Allows retired state police officers to serve as police officers for local police departments without diminution of retirement benefits; empowers the superintendent of state police to approve such service.
Introduced by Joseph DeStefano, District 3
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Allows retired state police officers to serve as police officers for local police departments without diminution of retirement benefits; empowers the superintendent of state police to approve such service.
Where it stands
referred to governmental employees
January 7, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Governmental Employees Committee: Held for Consideration · May 28, 2025
9
Yes
5
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
14 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jodi Giglio | 2 | No |
| Joseph DeStefano | 3 | No |
| Judy Griffin | 21 | Yes |
| Stacey Pheffer Amato | 23 | Yes |
| Kalman Yeger | 41 | Yes |
| Robert Carroll | 44 | Yes |
| William Colton | 47 | Yes |
| Simcha Eichenstein | 48 | Yes |
| Michael Reilly | 62 | No |
| Michael Tannousis | 64 | No |
Bill history
referred to governmental employees
held for consideration in governmental employees
referred to governmental employees
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.