A08299Introduced in the Assembly
Sets the effectiveness and duration of automatic orders in matrimonial actions.
Introduced by Charles Lavine, District 13
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Sets the effectiveness and duration of automatic orders in matrimonial actions.
Where it stands
signed chap.535
November 21, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
Assembly votes
3 recorded votes · each counted separately
Senate votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
SenateStage: Senate Floor Vote - Final Passage · June 11, 2025
50
Yes
9
No
4
Absent or Not Voting
63 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony Palumbo | 1 | Yes |
| Mario Mattera | 2 | Yes |
| Dean Murray | 3 | Absent |
| Monica Martinez | 4 | Yes |
| Steven Rhoads | 5 | Yes |
| Siela Bynoe | 6 | Yes |
| Jack Martins | 7 | Yes |
| Alexis Weik | 8 | No |
| Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | 9 | No |
| James Sanders | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
referred to judiciary
reported referred to rules
reported
rules report cal.407
ordered to third reading rules cal.407
passed assembly
delivered to senate
REFERRED TO RULES
SUBSTITUTED FOR S8270
3RD READING CAL.1660
PASSED SENATE
RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
delivered to governor
signed chap.535
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.