A08304Introduced in the Assembly
Relates to adjournments in contemplation of dismissal and suspended judgments in child protective proceedings in the family court.
Introduced by Charles Lavine, District 13
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Relates to adjournments in contemplation of dismissal and suspended judgments in child protective proceedings in the family court.
Where it stands
REFERRED TO CODES
May 11, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Floor Vote - Final Passage · May 11, 2026
141
Yes
0
No
9
Absent or Not Voting
150 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tommy Schiavoni | 1 | Yes |
| Jodi Giglio | 2 | Yes |
| Joseph DeStefano | 3 | Yes |
| Rebecca Kassay | 4 | Yes |
| Doug Smith | 5 | Yes |
| Philip Ramos | 6 | Yes |
| Jarett Gandolfo | 7 | Yes |
| Michael Fitzpatrick | 8 | Yes |
| Michael Durso | 9 | Yes |
| Steve Stern | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
referred to judiciary
reported referred to codes
reported referred to rules
referred to codes
reported
advanced to third reading cal.462
passed assembly
delivered to senate
REFERRED TO CODES
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.