A09517Introduced in the Assembly
Provides that an operational safety plan developed by the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation shall require that any employee check in with the incident commander or safety officer for incident specific procedures prior to taking any action at the incident location; provides that when deployment occurs in coordination with one or more other entities, and the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation is not the lead response agency, the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that employees are provided with the incident specific operational safety plan developed by the lead agency and/or incident commander.
Introduced by Ron Kim, District 40
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Provides that an operational safety plan developed by the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation shall require that any employee check in with the incident commander or safety officer for incident specific procedures prior to taking any action at the incident location; provides that when deployment occurs in coordination with one or more other entities, and the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation is not the lead response agency, the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that employees are provided with the incident specific operational safety plan developed by the lead agency and/or incident commander.
Where it stands
substituted by s8767
January 21, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Tourism, Arts And Sports Development Committee: Favorable refer to committee Rules · January 21, 2026
19
Yes
0
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
21 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Claire Valdez | 37 | Yes |
| Ron Kim | 40 | Yes |
| Robert Carroll | 44 | Yes |
| Stefani Zinerman | 56 | Yes |
| Charles Fall | 61 | Yes |
| Eddie Gibbs | 68 | Absent |
| Micah Lasher | 69 | Yes |
| John Zaccaro | 80 | Yes |
| Maryjane Shimsky | 92 | Yes |
| Christopher Tague | 102 | Yes |
Bill history
referred to tourism, parks, arts and sports development
reported referred to rules
reported
rules report cal.59
ordered to third reading rules cal.59
substituted by s8767
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.