A11387Introduced in the Assembly
Relates to age and service eligibility requirements for ordinary retirement for members of the unified court system; restores 55/30 for all members; reduces the retirement age from 63 to 62.
Introduced by Stacey Pheffer Amato, District 23
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Relates to age and service eligibility requirements for ordinary retirement for members of the unified court system; restores 55/30 for all members; reduces the retirement age from 63 to 62.
Where it stands
substituted by s10590
June 3, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
AssemblyStage: Assembly Ways And Means Committee: Favorable refer to committee Rules · June 3, 2026
31
Yes
1
No
3
Absent or Not Voting
35 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jodi Giglio | 2 | Yes |
| Joseph DeStefano | 3 | Yes |
| Philip Ramos | 6 | Yes |
| Michael Fitzpatrick | 8 | No |
| Michaelle Solages | 22 | Yes |
| David Weprin | 24 | Yes |
| Nily Rozic | 25 | Yes |
| Edward Braunstein | 26 | Yes |
| Andrew Hevesi | 28 | Yes |
| Alicia Hyndman | 29 | Absent |
Bill history
referred to governmental employees
reported referred to ways and means
reported referred to rules
reported
rules report cal.431
ordered to third reading rules cal.431
substituted by s10590
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.