S07448Introduced in the Senate
Provides that possession of a condom or other reproductive or sexual health device may not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing or proceeding as evidence of conduct which would constitute an offense defined in article 230 of the penal law.
Introduced by Brad Hoylman-Sigal, District 47
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Provides that possession of a condom or other reproductive or sexual health device may not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing or proceeding as evidence of conduct which would constitute an offense defined in article 230 of the penal law.
Where it stands
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES
April 29, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Judiciary Committee Vote · April 29, 2025
15
Yes
4
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
19 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony Palumbo | 1 | Yes |
| Steven Rhoads | 5 | No |
| Jack Martins | 7 | No |
| Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | 9 | No |
| Toby Stavisky | 11 | Yes |
| Jessica Ramos | 13 | Yes |
| John Liu | 16 | Yes |
| Zellnor Myrie | 20 | Yes |
| Kevin Parker | 21 | Yes |
| Andrew Lanza | 24 | Yes |
Bill history
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.