S10266Introduced in the Senate
Provides that the additional rate of sales and compensating use tax imposed by Cortland county shall not be subject to preemption.
Introduced by Lea Webb, District 52
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Provides that the additional rate of sales and compensating use tax imposed by Cortland county shall not be subject to preemption.
Where it stands
SIGNED CHAP.307
September 25, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
Assembly votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
Senate votes
2 recorded votes · each counted separately
AssemblyStage: Assembly Floor Vote - Final Passage · June 1, 2026
123
Yes
16
No
11
Absent or Not Voting
150 assemblymembers recorded in this Assembly vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each assemblymember voted
| Assemblymember | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tommy Schiavoni | 1 | Yes |
| Jodi Giglio | 2 | Yes |
| Joseph DeStefano | 3 | No |
| Rebecca Kassay | 4 | Yes |
| Doug Smith | 5 | Yes |
| Philip Ramos | 6 | Yes |
| Jarett Gandolfo | 7 | Yes |
| Michael Fitzpatrick | 8 | Yes |
| Michael Durso | 9 | Yes |
| Steve Stern | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
1ST REPORT CAL.1137
2ND REPORT CAL.
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
PASSED SENATE
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
referred to ways and means
substituted for a11338
ordered to third reading rules cal.325
home rule request
passed assembly
returned to senate
DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
SIGNED CHAP.307
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.