SB1458Introduced in the Senate
Grand juries; repealing requirements requiring endorsement of witness names on indictment. Effective date.
Introduced by Julie Daniels, District 29
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Grand juries; repealing requirements requiring endorsement of witness names on indictment. Effective date.
Where it stands
Motion expired
March 16, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate: THIRD READING · March 11, 2026
24
Yes
14
No
10
Absent or Not Voting
48 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Micheal Bergstrom | 1 | Yes |
| Ally Seifried | 2 | Yes |
| Julie McIntosh | 3 | No |
| Tom Woods | 4 | Yes |
| George Burns | 5 | No |
| David Bullard | 6 | Yes |
| Warren Hamilton | 7 | Yes |
| Bryan Logan | 8 | Yes |
| Avery Frix | 9 | Absent |
| Bill Coleman | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
First Reading
Authored by Senator Daniels
Second Reading referred to Judiciary
Coauthored by Representative Manger (principal House author)
Reported Do Pass Judiciary committee; CR filed
Placed on General Order
General Order, Considered
Measure failed: Ayes: 24 Nays: 14
Notice served to reconsider vote on measure Daniels
Motion expired
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.