SB431Introduced in the Senate
In preliminary provisions, further providing for definitions; and, in procedure, providing for acceptable denials.
Introduced by Tracy Pennycuick, District 24
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
An Act amending the act of February 14, 2008 (P.L.6, No.3), known as the Right-to-Know Law, in preliminary provisions, further providing for definitions; and, in procedure, providing for acceptable denials.
Where it stands
Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
February 4, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Communications & Technology: PN1281, Reported as Amended · October 28, 2025
11
Yes
0
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
11 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Picozzi | 5 | Yes |
| Frank Farry | 6 | Yes |
| John Kane | 9 | Yes |
| Nicholas Miller | 14 | Yes |
| Lisa Boscola | 18 | Yes |
| Lisa Baker | 20 | Yes |
| Tracy Pennycuick | 24 | Yes |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | 28 | Yes |
| James Andrew Malone | 36 | Yes |
| Kim Ward | 39 | Yes |
Bill history
Referred to Communications & Technology
Reported as amended
First consideration
Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.