H4662Introduced in the House
Regulation of charitable funds
Introduced by Christopher Wooten, District 69
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Amending Section 33-56-50, Relating To Organizations Exempt From Registration Provisions, So As To Regulate Charitable Organizations That Solicit, Collect, Earn, Or Receive More Than A Stated Amount In A Fiscal Year That Register With The Secretary Of State By Increasing Report Requirements; By Amending Section 33-56-70, Relating To Contracts With Professional Solicitors, So As To Require Written Contracts Between A Charitable Organization And Professional Fundraising Counsel, Professional Solicitor, Or Commercial Co-venturer To Be Filed With The Secretary Of State Under Certain Conditions; By Amending Section 33-56-90, Relating To Required Disclosures, So As To Require Any Entity That Is Soliciting For Charitable Organizations To Disclose The Legal Name And Purpose Of The Charity For Which They Are Soliciting; By Amending Section 33-56-110, Relating To Registration Of Professional Solicitors, Fundraising Counsels, Or Commercial Co-venturers, So As To Provide Registration Requirements For Commercial Co-venturers; And By Amending Section 33-56-120, Relating To Misrepresentations, So As To Prohibit Commercial Co-venturers From Using Registration With The Secretary Of State As An Endorsement By The State.
Where it stands
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
March 26, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: House: Passage Of Bill · March 25, 2026
113
Yes
0
No
11
Absent or Not Voting
124 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| William Whitmire | 1 | Yes |
| Adam Duncan | 2 | Yes |
| Phillip Bowers | 3 | Yes |
| Davey Hiott | 4 | Yes |
| Neal Collins | 5 | Yes |
| April Cromer | 6 | Yes |
| Lee Gilreath | 7 | Yes |
| Don Chapman | 8 | Yes |
| Blake Sanders | 9 | Yes |
| Thomas Beach | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
Prefiled
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Introduced and read first time
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Committee report: Favorable Labor, Commerce and Industry
Read second time
Roll call Yeas-113 Nays-0
Read third time and sent to Senate
Introduced and read first time
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.