S0369Introduced in the Senate
Commodity Code Execution
Introduced by Thomas Young, District 24
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Amending Section 39-73-10, Relating To State Commodity Code Definitions, So As To Provide That The Administrator Of The State Commodity Code Be The South Carolina Attorney General; By Amending Section 39-73-40, Relating To Transactions Where Prohibition Is Not Applicable, So As To Add An Agent Or Investment Advisor Representative As Individuals Subject To An Order To Deny, Suspend, Or Revoke A Person's License; By Amending Section 39-73-60, Relating To Prohibited Acts, So As To Replace Section 39-73-310 With Section 39-73-30; By Amending Section 39-73-80, Relating To State Securities Laws, So As To Make Conforming Changes; By Amending Section 39-73-315, Relating To Administrator Actions To Prevent Violations Or Imminent Violations, So As To Provide That The Administrator Can Issue An Order Related To Any Action That May Violate This Chapter; By Amending Section 39-73-320, Relating To Legal, Equitable, And Special Remedies Available To A Court For Enforcement, So As To Provide That The Administrator May Maintain An Action In The Richland County Court Of Common Pleas; By Amending Section 39-73-325, Relating To Penalties For Violations, So As To Provide That The Administrator May Refer Violations To The Appropriate Division Of The Attorney General's Office Or Other Authority; By Amending Section 39-73-330, Relating To The Administration Of This Chapter, So As To Make Conforming Changes; By Amending Section 39-73-340, Relating To The Authority To Promulgate Regulations, Forms, And Orders, So As To Make Conforming Changes; By Amending Section 39-73-350, Relating To The Applicability Of Sections 39-73-20, 39-73-50, And 39-73-60 To Persons Who Sell, Buy, Or Offer To Sell Or Buy Commodities In This State, So As To Provide Guidelines For Applicable Radio And Television Communications; By Amending Section 39-73-360, Relating To Judicial Review, So As To Provide Guidelines; By Amending Section 39-73-370, Relating To Defense In A Case Based On Failure To Make Physical Delivery, So As To Make Conforming Changes; By Adding Section 39-73-375 So As To Provide That The Attorney General May Retain Funds From Fines And Penalties To Offset Relevant Expenses; By Adding Section 39-73-400 So As To Provide For Severability Of This Chapter; And By Repealing Section 39-73-355 Relating To Administrative Proceedings.
Where it stands
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
May 8, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate: 2nd Reading · May 6, 2025
43
Yes
0
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
44 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas Alexander | 1 | Yes |
| Rex Rice | 2 | Yes |
| Richard Cash | 3 | Yes |
| Michael Gambrell | 4 | Yes |
| Thomas Corbin | 5 | Yes |
| Jason Elliott | 6 | Yes |
| Ross Turner | 8 | Yes |
| Danny Verdin | 9 | Yes |
| Billy Garrett | 10 | Yes |
| Joshua Kimbrell | 11 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced and read first time
Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources
Referred to Subcommittee: Young (ch), Williams, Elliott, Ott, Stubbs
Recalled from Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources
Committed to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Polled out of committee Labor, Commerce and Industry
Committee report: Favorable Labor, Commerce and Industry
Scrivener's error corrected
Read second time
Roll call Ayes-43 Nays-0
Read third time and sent to House
Introduced and read first time
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.