HB1065Introduced in the House
Revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.
Introduced by Travis Ismay, District 28
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.
Where it stands
Health and Human Services Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3. S.J. 23
March 2, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
House votes
3 recorded votes · each counted separately
Senate votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
SenateStage: Deferred to the 41st legislative day · March 2, 2026
4
Yes
3
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
7 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carl Perry | 3 | No |
| Tim Reed | 7 | Yes |
| Jamie Smith | 15 | Yes |
| Kevin Jensen | 16 | No |
| Sydney Davis | 17 | Yes |
| Tamara Grove | 26 | Yes |
| Curt Voight | 33 | No |
Bill history
First Reading House H.J. 37
Referred to House Health and Human Services H.J. 113
Scheduled for hearing
Health and Human Services Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 3. H.J. 17
House of Representatives Motion to amend, Passed, YEAS 35, NAYS 31. H.J. 338 Amendment 1065C
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended, Passed, YEAS 53, NAYS 13. H.J. 339
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Health and Human Services S.J. 296
Scheduled for hearing
Health and Human Services Motion to amend, Passed S.J. 23 Amendment 1065D
Health and Human Services Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3. S.J. 23
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.