SB134Introduced in the Senate
Restrict deference to a state agency's interpretation of a state statute, administrative rule, or policy.
Introduced by Sue Lucas-Peterson, District 13
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Restrict deference to a state agency's interpretation of a state statute, administrative rule, or policy.
Where it stands
Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 10, NAYS 3.
March 4, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
House votes
2 recorded votes · each counted separately
Senate votes
2 recorded votes · each counted separately
HouseStage: Deferred to the 41st legislative day · March 4, 2026
10
Yes
3
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
13 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| David Kull | 2 | Yes |
| Matt Roby | 5 | Yes |
| Tim Reisch | 8 | Yes |
| Tim Walburg | 8 | Yes |
| John Hughes | 13 | No |
| Kadyn Wittman | 15 | Yes |
| Mike Stevens | 18 | Yes |
| Will Mortenson | 24 | Yes |
| Rebecca Reimer | 26 | Yes |
| Peri Pourier | 27 | No |
Bill history
First Reading Senate S.J. 112
Referred to Senate State Affairs S.J. 121
Scheduled for hearing
State Affairs Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 1. S.J. 29
Senate Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 31, NAYS 3. S.J. 360
First Reading House H.J. 423
Referred to House Judiciary H.J. 446
Scheduled for hearing
Judiciary Do Pass, Failed, YEAS 3, NAYS 10.
Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 10, NAYS 3.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.