SB193Introduced in the Senate
Clarify the definition of backup electric generation.
Introduced by Casey Crabtree, District 8
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Clarify the definition of backup electric generation.
Where it stands
Intent to reconsider S.J. 364
February 23, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Do Pass Amended · February 23, 2026
17
Yes
17
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
35 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Rohl | 1 | Yes |
| Steve Kolbeck | 2 | Yes |
| Carl Perry | 3 | No |
| Stephanie Sauder | 4 | Yes |
| Glen Vilhauer | 5 | Yes |
| Ernie Otten | 6 | No |
| Tim Reed | 7 | Yes |
| Casey Crabtree | 8 | Yes |
| Joy Hohn | 9 | No |
| Liz Larson | 10 | Yes |
Bill history
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Commerce and Energy S.J. 138
Scheduled for hearing
Commerce and Energy Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 3.
Senate Do Pass, Failed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17. S.J. 344
Intent to reconsider S.J. 344
Senate Reconsidered, Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17. S.J. 355
Senate Motion to amend, Passed S.J. 363 Amendment 193C
Senate Do Pass Amended, Failed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17. S.J. 363
Intent to reconsider S.J. 364
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.