← All Texas bills

SB1959Introduced in the Senate

Relating to the authority of the North Texas Groundwater Conservation District to consider certain factors before granting or denying a permit.

Engrossed

Introduced by Brent Hagenbuch, District 30

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.

Official description

Relating to the authority of the North Texas Groundwater Conservation District to consider certain factors before granting or denying a permit.

Where it stands

Committee report sent to Calendars

May 20, 2025

How did lawmakers vote?

SenateStage: Read 3rd time · May 6, 2025

0

Yes

0

No

0

Absent or Not Voting

0 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each senator voted

SenatorDistrictVote

Bill history

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate

  2. Filed

  3. Read first time

  4. Referred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs

  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .

  6. Considered in public hearing

  7. Testimony taken in committee

  8. Vote taken in committee

  9. Reported favorably as substituted

  10. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar

  11. Committee report printed and distributed

  12. Placed on intent calendar

  13. Rules suspended-Regular order of business

  14. Read 2nd time

  15. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Hagenbuch

  16. Amended

  17. Vote recorded in Journal

  18. Passed to engrossment as amended

  19. Vote recorded in Journal

  20. Three day rule suspended

  21. Record vote

  22. Read 3rd time

  23. Passed

  24. Record vote

  25. Reported engrossed

  26. Received from the Senate

  27. Read first time

  28. Referred to Natural Resources

  29. Considered in formal meeting

  30. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)

  31. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator

  32. Committee report distributed

  33. Committee report sent to Calendars

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.