HB21Introduced in the House
Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Introduced by Ann Wagner, District MO-2
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Checking for a plain-English summary…
Official description
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.
Where it stands
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
January 24, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: On Passage RC# 27 · January 23, 2025
217
Yes
204
No
12
Absent or Not Voting
433 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nicholas Begich | AK | Yes |
| Barry Moore | AL-2 | Yes |
| Shomari Figures | AL-2 | No |
| Mike D. Rogers | AL-3 | Yes |
| Robert Aderholt | AL-4 | Yes |
| Dale Strong | AL-5 | Yes |
| Gary Palmer | AL-6 | Yes |
| Terri Sewell | AL-7 | No |
| Eric Crawford | AR-1 | Yes |
| French Hill | AR-2 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 5. (consideration: CR H335-345)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 21.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Ms. Chu moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H344-345)
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 21, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Chu demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H347-348)
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 205 - 216 (Roll no. 26).
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 204, 1 Present (Roll no. 27). (text: CR H335-336)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.