← All U.S. Congress bills

HB22Introduced in the House

SAVE Act Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act

Engrossed

Introduced by Chip Roy, District TX-21

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Checking for a plain-English summary…

Official description

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes.

Where it stands

Received in the Senate.

April 10, 2025

How did lawmakers vote?

HouseStage: On Passage RC# 102 · April 10, 2025

220

Yes

208

No

5

Absent or Not Voting

433 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each representative voted

RepresentativeDistrictVote
Nicholas BegichAKYes
Barry MooreAL-2Yes
Shomari FiguresAL-2No
Mike D. RogersAL-3Yes
Robert AderholtAL-4Yes
Dale StrongAL-5Yes
Gary PalmerAL-6Yes
Terri SewellAL-7No
Eric CrawfordAR-1Yes
French HillAR-2Yes

Bill history

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

  3. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.

  4. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.

  5. Rule H. Res. 294 passed House.

  6. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 294. (consideration: CR H1569-1579)

  7. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.

  8. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 22.

  9. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  10. Ms. Johnson (TX) moved to recommit to the Committee on House Administration. (text: CR H1569)

  11. The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.

  12. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 22, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Johnson (TX) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  13. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1580-1581)

  14. On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - 215 (Roll no. 101).

  15. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 208 (Roll no. 102). (text: CR H1569-1571)

  16. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  17. Received in the Senate.

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.