← All U.S. Congress bills

HB3628Introduced in the House

State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act

EngrossedSenate Energy And Natural Resources

Introduced by Gabe Evans, District CO-8

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Checking for a plain-English summary…

Official description

To amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to add a standard related to State consideration of reliable generation, and for other purposes.

Where it stands

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

December 15, 2025

How did lawmakers vote?

HouseStage: On Passage RC# 323 · December 11, 2025

218

Yes

207

No

8

Absent or Not Voting

433 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each representative voted

RepresentativeDistrictVote
Nicholas BegichAKYes
Barry MooreAL-2Yes
Shomari FiguresAL-2No
Mike D. RogersAL-3Yes
Robert AderholtAL-4Yes
Dale StrongAL-5Yes
Gary PalmerAL-6Yes
Terri SewellAL-7No
Eric CrawfordAR-1Yes
French HillAR-2Yes

Bill history

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.

  4. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  5. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

  6. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  7. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 23.

  8. Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-306.

  9. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 260.

  10. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 936 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.

  11. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 936. (consideration: CR H5522-5528; text: CR H5522-5523)

  12. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.

  13. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3628.

  14. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 936, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore (WV) amendment No. 1

  15. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3628, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  16. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5789)

  17. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 207 (Roll no. 323).

  18. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  19. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.